<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawyers Right Hand &#187; ECF and PACER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawyersrighthand.com/category/ecf-and-pacer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawyersrighthand.com</link>
	<description>Tutorials, tips on career, excellence and work/life balance for legal secretaries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 03:41:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PACER as a research tool</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersrighthand.com/pacer-as-a-research-tool.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pacer-as-a-research-tool</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersrighthand.com/pacer-as-a-research-tool.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ECF and PACER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Access to Court Electronic Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersrighthand.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<div class="snap_preview">
<p>The CM/ECF civil case search page (a few courts might still be using the old PACER interface, but the differences are mostly superficial) contains several fields, although 99% of the time, we only use case number.</p></div></div><p>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersrighthand.com/pacer-as-a-research-tool.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good ECF habits: Electronic Case Filing, one further thought</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersrighthand.com/good-ecf-habits-electronic-case-filing-one-further-thought.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=good-ecf-habits-electronic-case-filing-one-further-thought</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersrighthand.com/good-ecf-habits-electronic-case-filing-one-further-thought.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ECF and PACER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certificates of service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Docketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docketing practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecf procedures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic case filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filing proposed orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naming attachments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersrighthand.com/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One important thing legal secretaries need to bear in mind when using ECF.Know how, when your lawyer sends out a letter with The Biggest Grammar Gaffe of All Time, and he will not let you correct it? Have you ever&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersrighthand.com/good-ecf-habits-electronic-case-filing-one-further-thought.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ECF Procedures, Electronic Case Filing Best Practice</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersrighthand.com/ecf-procedures-electronic-case-filing-best-practice.htm?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ecf-procedures-electronic-case-filing-best-practice</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersrighthand.com/ecf-procedures-electronic-case-filing-best-practice.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ECF and PACER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certificates of service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Docketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docketing practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecf procedures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic case filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filing proposed orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naming attachments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersrighthand.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="entry">
<div class="snap_preview">
<p>A while back, opposing counsel in one of my cases electronically filed two documents in federal court — both within a week of each other — using the same incorrect event. First one document, and then</p></div></div><p>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersrighthand.com/ecf-procedures-electronic-case-filing-best-practice.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.geocities.com/seinfeld_soundbites/doubledip.mp3" length="45360" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

